Group ARV
The coin flip on this site is associative remote viewing — ARV — at its smallest possible size: one event, two outcomes, one viewer. Group ARV is the same machinery pointed at questions that matter more, worked by more than one viewer at a time. It is the most serious thing this system does, and it is open to members only.
What an Assignment Is
A group assignment starts with a real-world question that will resolve to one of a few discrete outcomes on a known date — a match with a winner, a number that will land above or below a line, any future fact that will be publicly checkable. You see the question; that is deliberate and honest. What you never see while working is a target.
Your session is free-response: a sketch and notes against nothing but a coordinate.
The candidate targets — one associated with each possible outcome — do not exist for your session until your sketch is submitted. Each viewer's session gets its own freshly selected set, drawn under the same target optimization used everywhere on this site, and excluding every target that viewer has ever been shown. No two viewers are working against the same images, which means no two viewers can fail the same way.
How the Group's Call Emerges
Sessions are judged the moment they arrive — independently, by the same judge that scores everything here, on the standard SRI scale, with no knowledge of what any other viewer produced. Each judged session becomes one indication: one viewer's evidence about which outcome's target was perceived.
Once the assignment reaches its minimum number of sessions, the indications aggregate into a single group call. Then everyone waits for the world to answer. When the event resolves, the assignment closes with the actual outcome on record next to what the group said — hits and misses both, permanently. No quiet deletions, no survivor curation. A track record that only keeps its wins is not a track record.
Why a Group Beats a Soloist
Redundancy is the oldest reliability trick in engineering, and it works here for the same reason it works in a flight computer: independent errors cancel, shared signal adds. One viewer having an off day is noise. Five viewers independently sketching the same waterfall is not.
The classic obstacle to group work was never the viewers — it was the judging. Scoring a full group cycle used to cost a qualified human hours per event, which is why historical group ARV efforts ran on heroic volunteer effort and tended to burn out. Here the judge is on demand: a group's sessions are scored within about a minute of arriving, around the clock, so a group's tempo is limited only by its viewers' willingness to view. The independence, meanwhile, is not an honor system. Separate target sets, separate judging, and sessions sealed before any result exists — the structure itself keeps viewers from leaning on each other.
Who Gets a Seat
An account, first — group assignments are member territory for the reasons laid out in What an Account Adds: without identity there is no history, no rating, and no way to keep you away from targets you have already seen. Beyond that, participation is gated by demonstrated record. The public coin flip is the proving ground, and viewers with a sustained record there are the pool that group assignments draw from.
That is not a velvet rope; it is quality control on the instrument. A group call is only as trustworthy as the independence and the track records of the viewers inside it, so the seats go to people who have shown their signal on the record. If that sounds like it could be you, the proving ground is open right now, and it does not even require an account to start.
